Address : 506, 3rd EYE THREE (III), Opp. Induben Khakhrawala, Girish Cold Drink Cross Road, CG Road, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, 380009.
Telephone : 079-40098991
The Bharatiya Sakshya Bill, 2023
News: Recently, The Bhartiya Sakshya Bill, 2023 was introduced in Lok Sabha. It repeals the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.
• The Act provides rules for the admissibility of evidence in legal proceedings. The Bill retains several parts of the Act.
• It removes certain colonial references from the Act, widens the ambit of electronic records admissible as evidence, and removes provisions related to telegraphic messages.
What are the key changes proposed in the Bill?
|Indian Evidence Act, 1872
|The Bharatiya Sakshya Bill, 2023
|Admissibility of electronic or digital records as evidence
|The Act provides for two kinds of evidence – documentary and oral evidence. Documentary evidence includes information in electronic records that have been printed or stored in optical or magnetic media produced by a computer. Such information may have been stored or processed by a combination of computers or different computers.
|The Bill provides that electronic or digital records will have the same legal effect as paper records.
It expands electronic records to include information stored in semiconductor memory or any communication devices (smartphones, laptops). This will also include records on emails, server logs, smartphones, locational evidence and voice mails.
As per the Bill, the information may have been created on, stored in, or processed by one or more computers or communication devices: (i) which may be standalone systems or on a computer network, or (ii) through an intermediary
|Under the Act, oral evidence includes statements made before Courts by witnesses in relation to a fact under inquiry.
|The Bill adds any information given electronically to be considered as oral evidence.
|Under the Act, documentary evidence includes primary and secondary evidence. Primary evidence includes the original document and its parts, such as electronic records and video recordings.
Secondary evidence contains documents that can prove the contents of the original. Secondary evidence includes certain copies of the original documents and oral accounts of the document’s content.
|The Bill expands secondary evidence to include: (i) oral and written admissions, and (ii) the testimony of a person who has examined the document and is skilled in the examination of documents.
|Production of Documents
|The Act provides for the production of documents. If a witness is summoned to produce a document and has it in their possession or power, they must bring it to Court regardless of any objection to its production or admissibility. The Court will determine the validity of such a document.
|The Bill adds that no Court will require any privileged communication between the Ministers and the President to be produced before it.
|A joint trial refers to the trial of more than one person for the same offence.
The Act states that in a joint trial, if a confession made by one of the accused which also affects other accused is proven, it will be treated as a confession against both.
|The Bill adds an explanation to this provision. It states that a trial of multiple persons, where an accused has absconded or has not responded to an arrest warrant, will be treated as a joint trial.
What are the other changes proposed in the Bill?
• It lays down specific criteria for admissibility of electronic evidence such as authenticity, integrity, reliability etc., which can prevent misuse or tampering of digital data.
• It provides for special provisions for admissibility of DNA evidence such as consent, chain of custody etc., which can enhance accuracy and reliability of biological evidence.
• It recognises expert opinion as a form of evidence such as medical opinion, handwriting analysis etc., which can assist in establishing facts or circumstances relevant to a case.
• It introduces the presumption of innocence as a fundamental principle of the criminal justice system, which means that every person accused of an offense is presumed to be innocent until proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt.